SUPER top players list

DillaKilla wrote:Might I ask m@tro for a 1v1? I don't recall you ever beating me and vod in a 2v1... and I most definately don't recall us having a 1v1.

Oh, I forgot to tell you, im :]. LOL.

Who i have never 1v1ed... And are you willing to stand up to that claim that you are way better than me? I'm not trying to be cocky or anything, but i know i haven't played you, and if I would have I would have known...

DillaKilla wrote:Who i have never 1v1ed... And are you willing to stand up to that claim that you are way better than me? I'm not trying to be cocky or anything, but i know i haven't played you, and if I would have I would have known...

It's funny how naive you are. You clearly don't remember when :], you and hope were on, and and :] pretended to be eagle. And said his sneaking was nearly flawless. I'm aura, m@tro, devious, :], box1, frostbite, gekko, scarf, raptor[klaw], beached. Regardless if you remember or not, I HAVE played you, 1v1's and team games in which I beat you in everyone.

http://oddlabs.com/games.php?id=1472577
http://oddlabs.com/games.php?id=1472580

Ah that was back when I sucked I have since gotten much better, ask liquid. I am still up for that challenge... And when you played me the only reason you won was because I didn't know how to defend the sneak. Give me a PM on what your time zone is, and what time in your zone. I'm in the Eastern, so it's almost 4 PM here. And BTW, dap beat me back then...

DillaKilla wrote:Ah that was back when I sucked I have since gotten much better, ask liquid. I am still up for that challenge... And when you played me the only reason you won was because I didn't know how to defend the sneak. Give me a PM on what your time zone is, and what time in your zone. I'm in the Eastern, so it's almost 4 PM here. And BTW, dap beat me back then...

You're full of your self lol. I've beaten Dap multiple of times, INFACT I beat him like 7-0. I <3 dap n all, but beating him isn't a big deal, nor is beating me. There's no doubt that you've improved, as you're still playing, i'm not as much or at all. Plus what do you mean back then it was only 3 months ago.

not to pick sides but i would like to point out the fact that those games are from 2 months ago and considering for the past month of so no1 has been on im guessing u cant improve a whole lot in a few weeks

Ah this is where the technical things come in.. Like hot keying, attacking, building, etc. You see, there is a lot more to tt than can be learned just in member vs member. And you still haven't accepted the 1v1...

And, you may think I'm an idiot that is making up things for his defense, but I play every single person differently. Eagle doesn't sneak, so I depend more on the little attacks that kill your gatherers then the big wave, and then u lied to me, tricking me into playing it wrongly. And eagle hates chiefs and sneak attacks, so when I play him I don't use those. I will tell you flat out, if I used sneak attacks and chiefs there would be no argument over this. I never use chiefs in mem vs mem games, but that doesn't mean I don't practice. Same with sneaks, some guests are good at defending. And not to be mean, but I think it is a little odd that I have asked you four times to 1v1, and the 3 you have replied to you don't say yes or no, just change the subject.

And I've beaten dap 10 times in a row on many occasions, even before I learned what I know now.

DillaKilla wrote:And, you may think I'm an idiot that is making up things for his defense, but I play every single person differently. Eagle doesn't sneak, so I depend more on the little attacks that kill your gatherers then the big wave, and then u lied to me, tricking me into playing it wrongly. And eagle hates chiefs and sneak attacks, so when I play him I don't use those. I will tell you flat out, if I used sneak attacks and chiefs there would be no argument over this. I never use chiefs in mem vs mem games, but that doesn't mean I don't practice. Same with sneaks, some guests are good at defending. And not to be mean, but I think it is a little odd that I have asked you four times to 1v1, and the 3 you have replied to you don't say yes or no, just change the subject.

And I've beaten dap 10 times in a row on many occasions, even before I learned what I know now.

Ok. 1st of all, you're getting really cocky. It's getting quite annoying now. I never use cheif anyways so why bring that up. And I sneaked you once in our 1v1. Not to mention both games your spots were superior to mine. Yeh, sure i'll 1v1.

So saying that i practice and don't use chiefs is cocky, i didn't know, sorry, and ok what time zone are you in and what time to play the game in your time zone?

sneaking and cheifing is a part of the game. "Doesn't matter if you win by a mile, or an inch, a win is a win"

of course there's the aspect of respecting your opponent in terms of limiting certain tactics that make the game 'not fun' - however generally the only frowned upon tactic is using towers and rushing with between 1 - 3q on large (or 1 - 2q on med)

anyways.. just SHHHHHHH, who cares who's better than who -_-

Ok, gotcha, I'll be quiet

Yeh, umm, im not good with time zones, im english. so umm, idk lol.

Deathy wrote:sneaking and cheifing is a part of the game. "Doesn't matter if you win by a mile, or an inch, a win is a win"

of course there's the aspect of respecting your opponent in terms of limiting certain tactics that make the game 'not fun' - however generally the only frowned upon tactic is using towers and rushing with between 1 - 3q on large (or 1 - 2q on med)

anyways.. just SHHHHHHH, who cares who's better than who -_-

for the record my 2 q on large is not rushing... but yes anything is fine. chiefs and sneaks r part of the game as deathy said. eagle has always used chiefs... usually that's the difference between winning losing to him for me. if I can take his chief out of it, I win like 90% of the time. personally I don't like chiefs, they make me play worse. imbetter without it. if I use it I depend on it too much instead of depending on my ability to get warriors. but that's my personal belief. quite frankly idc wat others do.

using a chief requires some, I repeat SOME, skill. not as much as only using warriors but still. personally I don't have that skill because i don't like to use chiefs. however I use native chief for fun sometimes. chiefs r a personal decision. who cares who uses it? please don't hate on sneaks... they r higher skill levelthan chiefs and potentially jus warriors. u have to live wit 5 warriors less than ur opponent for some amount of time and that is if u only use 1 sneak at a time.

I have not been on for a while and im gonna get back into the gist of playing, i wanna make it back up there haha, does anyone wanna help?


chatman, needs_teacher, python, training, WORST

I'll help

Deathy wrote:sneaking and cheifing is a part of the game. "Doesn't matter if you win by a mile, or an inch, a win is a win"

of course there's the aspect of respecting your opponent in terms of limiting certain tactics that make the game 'not fun' - however generally the only frowned upon tactic is using towers and rushing with between 1 - 3q on large (or 1 - 2q on med)

anyways.. just SHHHHHHH, who cares who's better than who -_-

Rofl...

...you guys still frown on 1-3q? Hehe guess without more people coming to play TT overtime you couldn't go "don't tower rush u tower rushing nub" -> "1q rush is nub" / "small is nub"-> "anyone who 2q rush is nub, play 3q its more fun" -> "tower rush is still nub" -> "medium is nub" -> "3q rush is nub" -> (I was expecting 4q)

I remember when you guys started the whole 3q thing and only went 4-5q I started going 6q... and actually won a lot rofl. I've switched between 'rush' and a 6q game. Never play the same strategy twice in a row anymore. Honestly, no strategy is noob and just because you don't like it doesn't mean you shouldn't be ready to defend against it and say gg when you get your ass handed to you.

Note: This doesn't extend to games where all players agree to not doing X beforehand/during the game.

Rushing is just a scum thing to do

Foxx wrote:Rushing is just a scum thing to do

Thanks for proving my point.  

we have stopped caring bout those ideals now. no one is on anyways, so y correct the few that r on? i jus mess around. work on my 2 q for fun.

once i get back on im putting my roman tactics from highschool knowledge into action

0. bong
1. EAGLE
2. Deathy
3. Aztec
4. glow
5. wizard
6. sigh/stoned
7. mindfuck
8. foxx
9. dap
10. Exiled

maybe other but yeah

Not trying to be cocky but I believe I'm much a head of joker at the moment (cause I'm been focussing a lot these past few weeks on TT, and joker has been inactive). Especially in these last few days since I've remastered my old "line of death" with 4q and have become much better with my mouse .

Infact now that I think of it, joker actually hasn't beaten me in a 1v1 in the last like 20 games we've played. Or since like 2009. He went through a period where he was like "I'm #1! Nobody can beat me!" on the forums years ago when he was arguably at his best, yet he would only play against me with secret name accounts and would only admit that it was him IF he beat me. If he didn't then he'd delete the name and pretend it never existed. I ended up quitting and leaving undefeated against joker (he said we coincidently never played against eachother, but that was bullshit and everyone knew it) and came back a year or so later. By then joker had matured and we "officially" played 10 games, where I won all 10. We haven't played against eachother since. And considering I've played much more than he has this year, I don't see how you managed to rank him up as higher than me . But yeah.. THATS JUST MY OPINION! No offence joker but I think you're alittle overrated at the moment - unless you prove otherwise in the near future, then I'll stand corrected .

And I'd say glow and azzy are ahead of joker too and you missed out Stoned who's a very good player.

In my opinion it goes
1. Me or Glow
3. Aztec
4. Joker
5. Stoned

Not sure with the rest, but that's my top 5 in all honesty based on recent games .

Deathy wrote:anyways.. just SHHHHHHH, who cares who's better than who -_-

well apparently

D e a t h y wrote:Not trying to be cocky but I believe I'm much a head of joker at the moment (cause I'm been focussing a lot these past few weeks on TT, and joker has been inactive). Especially in these last few days since I've remastered my old "line of death" with 4q and have become much better with my mouse Smile.

Infact now that I think of it, joker actually hasn't beaten me in a 1v1 in the last like 20 games we've played. Or since like 2009. He went through a period where he was like "I'm #1! Nobody can beat me!" on the forums years ago when he was arguably at his best, yet he would only play against me with secret name accounts and would only admit that it was him IF he beat me. If he didn't then he'd delete the name and pretend it never existed. I ended up quitting and leaving undefeated against joker (he said we coincidently never played against eachother, but that was bullshit and everyone knew it) and came back a year or so later. By then joker had matured and we "officially" played 10 games, where I won all 10. We haven't played against eachother since. And considering I've played much more than he has this year, I don't see how you managed to rank him up as higher than me Surprised. But yeah.. THATS JUST MY OPINION! No offence joker but I think you're alittle overrated at the moment Wink - unless you prove otherwise in the near future, then I'll stand corrected Very Happy.

you do  

oooo he got you